[Rashid Khan Contempt case] Special three Judge Bench of Supreme Court tomorrow will pronounce Judgment on the issue as to recall is maintainable or not and whether registry can take a decision or it’s the jurisdiction of the Court to decide it.

Judgment of Three judge Bench in Prashant Bhushan’s case letting him off by imposing Re. 1 fine has again overruled the sentence in Re: Vijay Kurle’s case.

Supreme Court Special Bench reserved order and refused to hear Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, as his appointment as an Amicus was against Rule 10 of the Supreme Court.

Senior Advocate Designation Is Not A Ticket To Insult The Dignity Of The Court.

The judgment passed by three Judge Bench of Supreme Court in Adv. Prashant Bhushan’s Contempt case has vitiated the conviction of Vijay Kurle and others in the case of Re: Vijay kurle in SMCP no. 02 of 2019.

Chief Justice of Bombay High Court Dipankar Dutta can be summoned as a witness in a contempt case initiated by him against a Lawyer.

SCBA President Dushyant Dave – Voice of whom!!!

The procedure followed in M. S. Ahlawat’s case and SCBA’s case (1998) 4 SCC 409 by constitution Bench mandates that the challenge to Contempt proceedings under  Writ should be heard by  Larger Bench of which earlier Judges are not members.

Prashant Bhushan  placed reliance on wrong legal position and on per-incuriam judgment of smaller Bench in Re: Vijay Kurle’s case.

Suo Motu congnizance of contempt of Supreme Court should be as per the
guideline set in P.N. Duda’s case.

The order passed by Three Judge Bench of Supreme Court’s in Prashant Bhushan’s case once again proved the illegalities committed by the smaller Bench of Justice Deepak Gupta.

Petition filed against Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra seeking action under Contempt and Perjury.

What are the reasons for inclusion/exclusion of the name of the
petitioner/informants in the recent suo motu contempt of court cases?

Truth prevails
The order passed by the Three Judge Bench in the recent Suo Motu Contempt case against Adv. Prashant Bhushan has OVERRULED the order passed by 2-Judge Bench in the Suo Motu contempt case Re: Vijay Kurle and others.

NEW PRECEDENT SET BY THE TWO JUDGE BENCH THAT THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE CONSTITUTION BENCH OF THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT BINDING IF NOT CONFIRMED BY THE PUBLICATIONS OF  ‘LEXIS-NEXIS’

Erroneous Legal Position Published By ‘Livelaw’ Regarding Cognizance Of Contempt Against Adv. Yatin Oza’s Case By Gujarat High Court.

Why has Shri. Rashid Khan declined the Rs. 400 Crores offer from a former Supreme Court Judge?

इस कारन से ठुकराया जस्टिस दीपक गुप्ता का 400 करोड रुपये का ऑफर। – रशीद खान पठाण

भ्रष्ट ,चोर ,जालसाज, देशद्रोही जजोद्वारा केस वापस लेने के लिए 400 करोड़ का ऑफर

Gujrat High Court has committed Contempt of Supreme Court while taking suo motu cognizance against Sr. Adv. Yatin Oza

Arrest Anti national Adv. Fali Nariman, retired Justice Deepak Gupta, Adv. Dushyant Dave.

भष्ट्राचारी, देशद्रोही रंजन गोगोई के सारे फैसले की फिर से सुनवाई की मांग

*सुप्रीम कोर्ट ऑफ इंडिया के जस्टिस नरीमन पर क्रिमिनल  केस करने वाले मानव अधिकार सुरक्षा परिषद के  राष्ट्रीय सचिव  रशीद खान पठान और अन्य के समर्थन मे सुप्रीम कोर्ट के इतिहास में सबसे ज्यादा वकीलों का वकालतनामा.*

NOTICE RELATED TO REPORTING OF SUO MOTO CONTEMPT PETITION